I
figured the spade finesse was still 50% and the heart finesse
was also 50%, so I decided to cash the ace of spades for
the vigorish that Benito might have started
with king-doubleton. If the A caught air, I'd take the
heart finesse. But the ace of spades caught Benito's king
and I made the hand for a big swing and we won the match!
The
moral of the story is that sometimes a great card player
wins points by just following suit (because you imagine
he's doing something great when all along he was doing
something mundane). My husband Matthew likes to tell a
story about the first time he played against Benito, when
Matthew was still a teenager. A very similar position arose,
and Matthew went up with the ace on the second round of
the suit. But that time, Benito had three small in the
suit! Perhaps this is where I got the bright idea to cash
the ace of spades on the above hand. Boy did I get lucky!:-)
-------------------------------------------
From
Danny Kleinman, Los Angeles
You
were good, not just lucky. and what Garozzo did was neither
mundane nor great (although at matchpoints it would have
been great). Mrs. Guggenheim or Mr. Smug would have taken
the king of spades and exited in hearts, putting you to
a guess that you'd probably have gotten right (rising with
the ace, then playing for 3-3 spades or a major-suit squeeze).
The Unlucky Expert would have taken the king of spades
and returned a spade, killing the squeeze. However, Futile
Willie would have defended just as Garozzo did.
Congratulations
on your good play!
Danny
-------------------------------------------
From
David Bird, England
Hi,
Pamela
Since
the clubs are 4-3, can you not afford to take the heart
finesse and fall back on a repeated spade finesse if it
fails? A successful repeated spade finesse is more likely
than dropping a doubleton king offside. So you would get
a 50% vigorish. (You don't make the contract,
it's true!)
Best
wishes,
David
Bird
Back to News and Photos page